PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1982
THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, MET AS A COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1982, AT 5:30 P.M. IN ROOM 211 CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING.
ON ROLL CALL THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL MEMBERS WERE PRESENT: RONALD J. WHITEHEAD ALICE SHEARER GRANT MABEY IONE M. DAVIS SYDNEY R. FONNESBECK EDWARD W. PARKER PALMER DEPAULIS.
Council Chairperson Sydney R. Fonnesbeck presided at this meeting.
Councilmember Ronald J. Whitehead conducted this meeting.
Albert Haines, Chief Administrative Officer, and Roger Cutler, City Attorney, were present at this meeting.
POLICY SESSION
Leigh von der Esch briefed the Council on several items of business on their calendar. A delegation of Mayors from Yugoslavia will visit Salt Lake City on September 10th. The Mayor has requested that the Council meet with the Mayors for lunch and dinner. Arlo Nelson has requested that the Council meet on September 16th at 5:00 to discuss the West Salt Lake City Master Plan. The meeting will take place in the Council Chambers.
Bryon Jorgensen discussed the audits that will be conducted and explained the process used to determine which audits will be done. Leigh yonder Esch briefed the Council on items on their agenda.
The policy session adjourned at 5:55 p.m.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, MET IN REGULAR SESSION ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1982, AT 6:00 P.M. IN ROOM 301 CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING.
ON ROLL CALL THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL MEMBERS WERE PRESENT: RONALD J. WHITEHEAD ALICE SHEARER GRANT MABEY IONE M. DAVIS SYDNEY R. FONNESBECK EDWARD W. PARKER PALMER DEPAULIS.
Mayor Ted Wilson and Roger Cutler, City Attorney, were present at this meeting.
Council Chairperson Sydney R. Fonnesbeck presided at and Councilmember Ronald J. Whitehead conducted this meeting.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Approval of Minutes:
Councilmember Parker moved and Councilmember Mabey seconded to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Salt Lake City Council for the meeting held Tuesday, August 10, 1982, which motion carried, all members voting aye.
(M 82-2)
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember Parker seconded to approve the minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting held Thursday, August 12, 1982, which motion carried, all members voting aye.
(M 82-2)
PETITIONS
Petition 4 of 1982 submitted by Utah State Department of Natural Resources.
RE: Requesting the vacation of Gertie and Irving Streets.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council deny Petition No. 4 of 1982. It is recommended that the alley be closed - not vacated, and sold to the abutting property owners at fair market value. However, the alley should not be closed without a commitment from the petitioners to purchase the land. The drainage problem should then be corrected.
AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: The property has been appraised by Edward P. Westra at approximately $162,342.
DISCUSSION: The petition has been reviewed by the Planning Commission, Public Utilities, Fire, Engineering, Transportation, Fixed Assets, and the City Attorney’s Office. They have recommended that this public property is not needed as a street, and closure and sale may be appropriate subject to the following conditions: 1) standard utility easements be retained, and 2) that the petitioner execute the standard form agreement entitled Waiver of Installation of Public Way Improvements. It is the staff’s position that the drainage problem, which began occurring after the Natural Resources building was constructed, is the state’s responsibility and they are held liable for any damages caused by the drainage problem. The state has declined to accept such responsibility and has failed to take action to solve the problem.
If the petitioners decline to purchase the property, the city has two options: 1. Give the state formal notice to resolve the drainage problem or the city will bring suit for injunctive relief. 2. If the Council believes the drainage threatens to create a public nuisance, give the state formal notice to resolve the problem, or after a fixed period, the city will resolved the problem (estimated cost $2,000 - $10,000) and bring suit against the state for reimbursement. Councilmember Whitehead stated that this item has been approved except for the final ordinance signing. He stated that there is a question about Mr. Carlson actually signing the waiver to hold the city harmless, therefore the ordinance should be approved as long as Mr. Carlson signs the papers.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember Mabey seconded to adopt Ordinance 66 of 1982, vacating the un-vacated portions of Gertie and Irving Streets in the vicinity of Redwood Road and North Temple and the City Recorder be advised that Mr. Carlson must appear and fulfill his part of the bargain in terms of releasing the city from any liability and the City Recorder should also refrain from recording said ordinance until this has been satisfied, which motion carried all members voting aye.
(P 82-195)
DEPARTMENTAL BUSINESS
AIRPORT AUTHORITY
RE: Resolution of appreciation to William H. Kibbie, for his contribution to aviation and the Salt Lake City International Airport over the years, by naming the Executive Terminal (east side) the “William H. Kibbie Executive Terminal”.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember Parker seconded to adopt the resolution of appreciation for William H. Kibbie, Resolution 78 of 1982, which motion carried all members voting aye.
(R 82-17)
RE: Introduction of proposed Airport Use Fee Ordinance Amendment: Sections 2-2-20, 2-2-27.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Council consider amendments to Sections 2-2-20, 2-2-27 of the Salt Lake City Code as presented.
DISCUSSION: This refers to the terms and conditions of the Airport Use Agreement (AUA) dated July 1, 1978 between the City and American, Frontier, Republic, PSA, Texas International, United and Western (Participating Airlines). Exhibit C, Part I Section (d) of the AUA requires the Airport review and adjust terminal rentals and landing fees at the Salt Lake City International Airport in order to reflect operating conditions for the coming fiscal year.
Effective July 1, 1982 space rentals are estimated at $38.50 psf (from $31.50) and landing fees at $.40 per M lb. (from $.60). The large decrease in landing fees is due to the substantial increase in Western Airlines Operation. (N.B. Western’s increase has no effect on terminal space rental.) In order to provide rentals and fees for the non-participating airlines, and commuters that are consistent with those established for the Participating Airlines for the current fiscal year, the rates established by Ordinance also require adjustment. They are estimated at: 1) basement and bag make-up space - $19.25 psf (from $15.75), 2) all other terminals space - $38.50 psf (from $31.50), 3) landing fees - $.40 per M lb. (from $.60). Calculation of the estimated fees for FY 83 were agreed to by the Airport Affairs Committee (airlines) on June 23, 1982 and the Airport Authority Board on June 23, 1982.
Councilmember Whitehead, without objection, moved the proposed Airport Use Fee Ordinance Amendment (Sections 2-2-20 & 2-2-27) to the consent agenda for September 14, 1982.
(O 82-50)
CITY ATTORNEY
RE: Resolution pertaining to $1,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (Litton Industries, Inc. Project) Series 1980 of Salt Lake City, Utah authorizing the execution and delivery of a First Supplemental Agreement among the City, Litton Industries, Inc. and the bondholder and authorizing the execution and delivery of a First Supplemental Pledge and Security Agreement between the City and the Security Trustee for said bonds and authorizing the execution and delivery of various documents in connection with the foregoing and related matters.
Councilmember Mabey moved and Councilmember Parker seconded to approve Resolution 79 of 1982, pertaining to $1,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (Litton Industries) and authorizing the execution and delivery of various documents, which motion carried all members voting aye.
(Q 82-29)
RE: Introduction of proposed Impounding of Vehicles Ordinance, Section 20 of Traffic Code.
RECOMMENDATION: that the Council consider amendments to Article 20 of the Traffic Code of the Revised Ordinances of Salt Lake City, Utah, regarding vehicle impounds.
DISCUSSION: There has recently been an increase in the number of civil rights actions filed across the country regarding the impoundment of vehicles. These cases have resulted in increased costs to municipalities due to judgments regarding impound procedures which have been held insufficient to protect an individual’s rights of due process and the imposition of attorney’s fees. Therefore, it was felt necessary to amend the City’s impound ordinance in order to incorporate recent case law developments in this area.
The ordinance provides that notice will be provided to owners of vehicles within 48 hours after the owner’s vehicle has been impounded. It also gives the owner of the vehicle an opportunity to request a hearing before a hearing examiner to determine whether there existed probable cause to initially impound the vehicle. The ordinance also narrows the situations for which a car may be impounded; currently a vehicle may be impounded for any violation of the traffic code. The Police Department and the City Prosecutor’s Office have reviewed and approved the provisions of the ordinance.
Councilmember Whitehead, without objection, moved the proposed Impounding of Vehicles Ordinance (Section 20 of the Traffic Code) to the consent agenda for September 14, 1982.
(O 82-51)
RE: Proposed ordinance amending Section 20-16-1 (1) of the Revised Ordinances of Salt Lake City, Utah, 1965, relating to the definition of secondhand dealer.
Councilmember Whitehead, without objection, moved the proposed ordinance relating to the definition of secondhand dealer [Section 20-16-1 (1) to the consent agenda for September 14, 1982.
(O 82-52)
RE: An ordinance amending Title 24 of the Revised Ordinances of Salt Lake City, Utah, 1965, by amending Chapters 5 through 11, relating to Municipal Government.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember Davis seconded to refer the ordinance amending Title 24 of the Revised Ordinances, relating to Municipal Government to Committee of the Whole for Thursday, September 9, 1982 and be placed on the Council agenda for September 14, 1982, which motion carried all members voting aye.
(O 82-562)
CITY COUNCIL
RE: An ordinance amending Title 1 by creating an Animal Advisory Board.
Councilmember Whitehead moved, without objection, to refer the proposed ordinance amending Title 1 by creating an Animal Advisory Board to Committee of the Whole.
(O 82-53)
RE: A resolution relating to City’s interest in public streets, alleys, or highways, which have been or will be dedicated for public purpose.
Councilmember Mabey moved and Councilmember Parker seconded to approve alternate resolution B, Resolution 80 of 1982, to waive the filing fees only, encouraging neighborhood petitions to vacate alleys and fee waiver qualifications, which motion carried all members voting aye.
(R 82-18)
RE: A resolution relating to providing assistance to the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City in clearing title to property for a Housing Authority Project to be located on the northwest corner of 900 South and 500 East. (Jeffrey Court and related right-of-way.)
Councilmember Mabey moved and Councilmember Parker seconded to adopt Resolution 81 of 1982, relating to providing assistance to the Housing Authority in clearing title to property for a Housing Authority Project to be located on the northwest corner of 900 South and 500 East (Jeffrey Court), which motion carried all members voting aye.
(C 82-589)
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
RE: Ordinance amending Chapter 9 of Title 5.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance which will allow Salt Lake City to give a permit for power to panel clearances for construction purposes only and not complete and final power to the building.
DISCUSSION: At the present time we have a problem that no special consideration is given for temporary power to panel. Once the panel is energized in effect, the project has final power and the City has lost control. This ordinance will allow the Building Division to give power to panel clearances for construction purposes only. Presently we are requiring an agreement and an escrow deposit to protect the City from premature occupancy. The new ordinance will eliminate this practice. Utah Power and Light Officials have been contacted and they feel our proposal would be an appropriate procedure.
Councilmember Mabey moved and Councilmember Parker seconded to adopt Ordinance 67 of 1982, amending Chapter 9 of Title 5, relating to electrical regulations, which motion carried all members voting aye.
(O 82-48)
FIRE DEPARTMENT
RE: Interlocal Agreement for Arson Unit.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the Interlocal Agreement to allow Salt Lake City to continue to participate in the Special Arson Fire Enforcement Unit (SAFE).
AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: Financing to come from the Salt Lake City Corporation general fund.
DISCUSSION: There is a need to coordinate across jurisdictional boundaries. Having the County Prosecutor involved throughout the case is necessary to successfully prosecute difficult cases. By coordinating our efforts and equipment the central agency can accomplish far more than any individual agency. A successful arson unit deters people considering this crime.
Councilmember Whitehead, without objection, referred the interlocal agreement for the Arson Unit to Administration for further clarification of the costs.
(C 82-560)
OFFICE OF BUDGET & MANAGEMENT PLANNING
RE: City Council approval is requested for 8th Year (1982-83) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding for Wasatch Front Regional Council Planning Studies.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Council approve the expenditure of $13,660 from 8th Year CDBG funds for planning studies to be completed by the Wasatch Front Regional Council.
AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: Sufficient funds exist in the 8th Year CDBG contingency budget for this project.
DISCUSSION: The Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC) has requested a small CDBG appropriation from the four CDBG entitlement jurisdictions in Salt Lake County for the purpose of completing relevant county-wide planning studies. Briefly, the WFRC proposes to complete three planning studies at a total cost of $42,686, with compensation broken down as follows: Salt Lake County 54% $23,050, Salt Lake City 32% $13,660, Sandy City 7% $ 2,988, West Valley City 7% $ 2,988. Total $42,686.
Study #1 - GROWTH PROJECTIONS
The Wasatch Front Regional Council will prepare a 20-year projection of population, households and employment. The projection will be documented in a technical report which will give the projections in five-year increments, give a projection for surrounding areas, and document the procedures and assumptions used in preparing the projection. Specific areas for which projections will be made include Salt Lake City and six subareas within the City, West Valley City, Sandy City, and Salt Lake County with six subareas of the County. The projections will be consistent with Regional and County projections and will be developed in cooperation with local planners from each jurisdiction. The projections are necessary to address issues including housing needs, economic development, and planning for orderly growth.
Study #2 - DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC AGENCY POLICY GUIDELINES FOR THE WASATCH CANYON AREAS OF SALT LAKE COUNTY.
Written policy guidelines for canyon management agencies to consider in adopting their individual policies will be developed and distributed to affected governmental agencies and other interested parties. Options for preserving vital portions of the canyons from further development by transferring property from private to public (or quasi- public) ownership will be studied and specific recommendations generated. Existing comprehensive development plans for the more heavily utilized canyon areas will be reviewed to determine if they are still adequate for balancing recreational, watershed, game habitat and flood control needs. While the Salt Lake Canyon Advisory Committee will continue to be the main forum for the discussion of canyon related issues and problems, consideration will be given to the creation of a permanent mechanism for coordinating ongoing policy development.
Study #3 - STUDY OF POTENTIAL FOR SHARED FACILITIES AND SERVICES BY SALT LAKE COUNTY GENERAL PURPOSE GOVERNMENTS.
The WFRC will identify the potential for increasing joint use of local government facilities and services. Current examples of cooperative arrangements with Salt Lake County and other areas will be documented. Barriers to further joint usage will be identified as well as suggested methods for overcoming barriers. A report containing specific recommendations and a plan of action will be developed for consideration by local government implementing agencies. If legislative authority beyond what is available in the State’s Interlocal Cooperation Act (TJCA 11-13-1-26) is required to implement recommendations, proposed legislation will be drafted.
Councilmember Davis stated that she felt this was a duplication of the City Planning Department. She stated that she also had concerns about the funding to be taken from the general fund next year, and the fact that there are only four Salt Lake County cities included in this study. She stated that she would rather take the money and supplement the City’s Planning Department. Doug Carlson, Office of Budget and Management Planning, addressed the Council. He stated that there are three studies included and only 25% of the total funding request would be used for the growth projections. He stated that this is an on-going process of updating and assimilating the data for use region wide - not just for Salt Lake City.
Mr. Carlson indicated that the four cities are the only Community Development Block Grant entitlement cities in the county. Wasatch Front Regional Council has received approval from the other three cities. He stated that no one had committed general fund money for next year, but they were going to seek funding from that source. Councilmember Whitehead asked what benefits Salt Lake City would gain by this study. Mr. Carlson stated that the benefits are regional, and Salt Lake City is interested in regional sewage treatments and solid waste management and water quality studies. Councilmember Whitehead stated that the City just paid millions of dollars for that type of study. Councilmember Shearer stated that she felt this particular set of plans is not a high priority item for CD funds, therefore she was against it.
Councilmember Davis moved and Councilmember Shearer seconded to deny the $13,600 for the Wasatch Front Regional Council for planning studies, which motion carried all members voting aye.
(T 82-22)
RE: Fee change for the regulation of work in the public ways.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt this ordinance to revise the permit and inspection fees for regulation of work in the public ways.
AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: This action will not require any funds nor will it adversely affect the budgeted revenues.
DISCUSSION: The Office of Budget and Management Planning recently completed a management review on the regulation of construction work in the public ways. It was found that the new permit and inspection fees are higher than the actual increased cost to the City to provide the service. This new ordinance adjusts the fees so the City will only recover the incremental cost associated with this program.
Councilmember Whitehead, without objection, referred the proposed ordinance amending the permit and inspection fees for regulation of work in the public ways to the Public Improvements Committee.
(B 82-4)
RE: Public hearings for the proposed Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG) application for the Block 53 Phase I Project.
RECOMMENDATION: That public hearings be scheduled on September 21, 1982 and October 12, 1982 to discuss the need for UDAG involvement in the Block 53 project and to receive public comment regarding such need.
DISCUSSION: Price Development Company is desirous of UDAG involvement to provide partial financing for their Block 53 Phase I development and has requested that the City submit a UDAG application to HUD in October 1982. The City is required by UDAG regulations to hold two public hearings to receive public comment prior to submitting the application.
Councilmember Mabey moved and Councilmember Parker seconded to set dates for Public Hearings on September 21, 1982 at 6:15 p.m. and October 12, 1982 at 6:30 p.m. (Group Homes as conditional use is already scheduled at 6:15) to discuss the proposed Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG) for the Block 53 Phase I Project, which motion carried all members voting aye.
(T 82-27)
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
RE: An ordinance amending Section 6-2-2 of the Revised Ordinances of Salt Lake City, Utah, 1965, relating to sale of grave sites. Councilmember Davis asked Mr. Haines if the Administration would send letters regarding this amendment. Albert Haines, Chief Administrative Officer, indicated in response to Councilmember Davis that he would notify Mr. Gust and stated that if there have been any collection letters sent out, they will be rescinded immediately. Councilmember Davis also requested that the Administration notify all morticians. Mr. Haines indicated that they would be notified.
Councilmember Mabey moved and Councilmember Parker seconded to adopt Ordinance 68 of 1982, amending Section 6-2-2 of the Revised Ordinances of Salt Lake City, Utah, 1965, relating to the sale of grave sites, which motion carried all members voting aye.
(O 82-35)
RE: A resolution amending Compensation Plan for Salt Lake City Corporation.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution amending the Compensation Plan for Salt Lake City Corporation employees to allow the implementation of an Early Retirement Incentive Program for all employees.
AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: This plan will not require additional monies to be budgeted either this year or in future years since employee’s annual salaries have been budgeted. All retirement incentives will be paid from these amounts. The savings associated with this plan shall allow departments flexibility in determining organizations and will not cause a fiscal strain upon any departments.
DISCUSSION: The amendment to the Compensation Plan is requested so that the retirement incentive program, based upon a percentage of sick leave accumulated, may be increased up to 100 percent buy-back depending on the individual incentive offer.
Councilmember Shearer stated that the Council wanted a copy when the plan is complete. She also asked why there were so many documents included in this. Mr. Haines indicated that there are three documents in the plan: #1 is the resolution amending the compensation plan; #2 is the executive policy; and #3 is the implementation plan outlining procedures for the departments. Mr. Haines also indicated that the only information not included is the top information for the executive policy form and the sunset date which is June 30, 1984.
Councilmember Parker asked about the report on positions held by retiring employees indicating concern that this might increase the number of reclassifications. Mr. Haines indicated that they would evoke a freeze, with the exception of emergency hires only. There will be no positions replaced pending an organizational review of those departments affected. He stated that this could not be done until the intent statements are received at the end of October. This will coincide directly with the budget. The Council will be able to exercise budgetary control. The Administration will have to submit to the Council the organizational effects as well as the budgetary effects of this program.
Councilmember Parker moved and Councilmember Davis seconded to adopt Resolution 82 of 1982, amending the Compensation Plan for Salt Lake City Corporation and implementing an Early Retirement Incentive Program, which motion carried all members voting aye.
(O 82-31)
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
RE: Renewal of contract with City/County Health Department for Fiscal 1982- 1983.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Council consider authorizing the execution of an interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Salt Lake County and the Salt Lake City-County Board of Health.
AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: Budgeted in the Office of Personnel Management 1982- 1983 fiscal budget.
DISCUSSION: This is a renewal of basically the same contract executed last year for physicals for new employees, industrial injuries, and annual public-safety physicals. The contract reflects a small increase in per-item costs.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember Mabey seconded to approve Resolution 83 of 1982, authorizing the execution of an interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Salt Lake County and the Salt Lake City-County Board of Health, which motion carried all members voting aye.
(C 82-324)
POLICE DEPARTMENT
RE: Revised ordinance relating to wrecker service within Salt Lake City.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an ordinance amending Sections 1, 2, 4 and 5 of Chapter 32 of Title 20 of the Revised Ordinances of Salt Lake City, Utah, 1965, relating to wrecker service.
DISCUSSION: Any wrecking service providing towing service for S.L.C. Corporation must be licensed through the S.L.C. License Assessor. Revised ordinances states the definition of a wrecker service and tow truck. The fee for license shall be $25 per annum, plus $25 for each tow truck in excess of one. The City License Division must have on file a certificate of insurance for the wrecking service licensed which names Salt Lake City as a named insured.
Councilmember Whitehead, without objection, referred to the Public Safety Committee the proposed ordinance amending Sections 1, 2, 4 and 5 of Chapter 32 of Title 20, relating to wrecker service.
(O 82-54)
PUBLIC WORKS
RE: The Official Notice of Bond Sale for Special Improvement District #622, bids to be opened September 28, 1982 at 12:00 noon.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember Parker seconded to adopt Resolution 84 of 1982, approving the Official Notice of Bond Sale for Special Improvement District #622, which motion carried all members voting aye.
(Q 82-3)
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Sanford Rosenthal, representing the Veterans of Foreign Wars, Keith Burnham, representing the American Legion, and Ken Wright, representing the Disabled American Veterans, addressed the Council regarding the City’s policies for hiring veterans. Mr. Rosenthal passed out a final draft of an Affirmative Action Program for Salt Lake City Corporation, Veterans Section, and indicated that he wanted the draft to read “served in the armed forces” rather than eliminating the Air Force and also “served during a period of conflict as defined by Congress of the United States’ rather than engaged in war.
These items appear on page three paragraph 4. He stated they don’t want a separation between the Vietnam era and World War II era veterans. Mr. Burnham stated that he thinks this draft is a good start. He stated that the policy and Affirmative Action Plan should be stated separately and more clearly. Mr. Wright stated that we are responsible for restoring veterans to a productive life and further stated that we cannot turn our backs on them by ignoring the Veteran’s preference laws.
Dale Rogers, Martin Blaustein, John Malerny and other veterans also addressed the council indicating their concerns regarding hiring of veterans by the City. They indicated they do not want an automatic opportunity, but recognition for sacrifice and time spent in the service. Veteran’s preference recognizes a veteran’s commitment to his country and provides a balance for job applicants. Art Hurry addressed the Council. He stated that he is an honorably discharged U.S. Navy veteran of World War II. He stated that being drafted was the best thing to happen to him up to that point because of the depression. He stated that he received many benefits from the service, and felt it unfair for veterans who had never been in any danger to receive the same preferential treatment as veterans who had. He also stated that he could not justify, after 38 years, receiving preferential treatment after the benefits he had already received from his service. Councilmember Whitehead indicated that the veterans should meet with Albert Haines, since this issue is an administrative item.
(G 82-32)
The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m.