PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, JANUARY 11, 1983
THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, MET AS A COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 11, 1983, AT 5:30 P.M. IN ROOM 211 CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING.
ON ROLL CALL THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL MEMBERS WERE PRESENT: RONALD J. WHITEHEAD ALICE SHEARER GRANT MABEL LONE M. DAVIS SYDNEY R. FONNESBECK EDWARD W. PARKER.
Council Chairman Grant Mabey presided at this meeting.
Council Chairman Grant Mabey conducted this meeting.
POLICY SESSION
The Council Committee on Policies and Procedures met from 5:00 to 5:30 p.m. to discuss items relating to the Council travel budget and travel procedures. Present at that meeting were Councilmembers Davis, Fonnesbeck, Parker, and Mabey. At 5:30 p.m. Albert Haines, Jim Talebreza, John Rosenthal and Joe Anderson presented the Council with the report on garbage pickup in the alleys. Public Works presented a video tape showing the difficulty of getting the side-loading garbage trucks through city alleys. Mr. Rosenthal showed alternatives to having City pickup done and cost of contracting out alley garbage pickup. The Council directed staff members to set up a time for a presentation for those residents who petitioned for alley garbage pickup.
The policy session adjourned at 6:00 p.m.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, MET IN REGULAR SESSION ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 11, 1983, AT 6:00 P.M. IN ROOM 301 CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING.
ON ROLL CALL THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL MEMBERS WERE PRESENT: RONALD J. WHITEHEAD ALICE SHEARER GRANT MABEY IONE M. DAVIS SYDNEY R. FONNESBECK EDWARD W. PARKER PALMER DEPAULIS,
Mayor Ted Wilson, Albert E. Haines, Chief Administrative Officer and Roger Cutler, City Attorney, were present at the meeting.
Council Chairman Grant Mabey presided at this meeting.
Council Chairman Grant Mabey conducted this meeting.
Invocation was given by Police Chaplain Clarence Fields.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Approval of Minutes:
Councilmember Parker moved and Councilmember DePaulis seconded to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Salt Lake City Council held Tuesday, January 4, 1983, which motion carried, all members voting aye.
(M 83-1)
Special Recognition:
Councilmember Parker read a proclamation expressing appreciation and gratitude to Mark Hafey, Planning and Zoning Department, for exceptional service rendered to the public and the City; a plaque was also presented to Mr. Hafey. Councilmember Davis stated that she has worked with Mr. Hafey for six years and he has always treated her in the same courteous manner. Council Members Fonnesbeck and Mabey expressed their personal appreciation to Mr. Hafey; Councilmember Whitehead stated that the entire Council felt the same gratitude for Mr. Hafey. Mayor Wilson also expressed his thanks and appreciation to Mr. Hafey.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember Davis seconded to accept the proclamation, which motion carried, all members voting aye.
(G 83-1)
PETITIONS
Petition 400-6 submitted by Beehive Lodge No. 407 - Ernest Hughes.
RE: The petitioners are requesting that property located at 659 North 3rd West be rezoned from its present “C-l” classification to a “C-3” classification.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council hold a public hearing on February 8, 1983 at 6:30 p.m. to discuss Petition 400-6.
AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: The petitioner is required to pay a $50 advertising fee to the City Recorder.
DISCUSSION: A “C-1” classification permits a fraternal society, but does not permit the issuance of a Class “B” liquor license. The petitioners have requested this zoning change so they can be issued the Class “B” liquor license. The Planning Commission reviewed this petition and it is their recommendation, by a split vote, that the petition be denied and the property maintain its present zoning for the following reasons: 1. A “C-3” or a “C-3A” classification is inconsistent with the present land use on this block frontage. 2. The reclassification to a “C-3” or “C-3A” classification would be inconsistent with the master plan for the area, which calls for the stabilization of the area and a diminishing of any strip zoning. 3. There must be some rationale for commercial zoning and the placement of liquor establishments and there are other adequate “C-3” and “C-3A” zoned areas where such use may take place. Included in this petition is a copy of the Planning Commission meeting minutes; also included is Petition 134 of 1982 submitted by the Capitol Hill Neighborhood Council opposing the construction of the Beehive Elks Lodge in their neighborhood council area. It is recommended that these petitioners also be notified of the public hearing to be scheduled for February 8, 1983.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember DePaulis seconded to schedule a public hearing for February 8, 1983 at 6:30 p.m. to discuss Petition 400-6 of 1982, which motion carried, all members voting aye.
(P 83-1)
DEPARTMENTAL BUSINESS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
#1. RE: Ordinance amending Chapter 6 of Title 51 of the zoning ordinances by adding a new section 16 relating to conditional use of schools.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council hold a public hearing on February 8, 1983 at 6:15 p.m.
DISCUSSION: At the present time the Board of Education has closed schools or partially closed schools due to the lack of enrollment. Those schools that are closed permanently are disposed of by the Board of Education and the property is redeveloped in keeping with the “R-2” zoning. Some schools are only closed temporarily as there are indications that within a relatively short while there will again be a need for a school in the area. The only alternative the Board of Education has is to board up the buildings, which can be a serious problem to the neighborhood.
The proposed ordinance would make it possible for the temporary reuse of buildings owned by the Board of Education where it is felt that they will be reopened as schools. The ordinance will allow the Board of Adjustment, upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission, to permit office space for limited public/private, charitable/educational purposes on a temporary basis. The Board of Education has reviewed the amendment and is in favor.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember DePaulis seconded to schedule a public hearing for February 8, 1983 at 6:15 p.m. to discuss amending Chapter 6 of Title 51 by adding a new Section 16 relating to conditional use of schools, which motion carried, all members voting aye.
(O 83-2)
#2. RE: Consider and adopt the Salt Lake City Amendment to Area 1 - West Airport Master Annexation Policy Declaration and direct the City Attorney’s Office to prepare the necessary annexation documents.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember DePaulis seconded to adopt Resolution 2 of 1983, adopting Annexation Policy Declaration Amendment No. 1.1; and also direct the City Attorney’s Office to prepare the necessary annexation documents, which motion carried, all members voting aye.
(W 82-10)
FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
#1. RE: Industrial revenue bond application: Prowswood, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Council consider the approval of an inducement resolution for an industrial revenue bond for Prowswood, Inc. in the amount of $8,000,000, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the City Attorney approve the resolution as to form. 2. That the application meet all necessary financial requirements of the City. 3. That Prowswood, Inc. pay the established non-refundable fee for processing.
DISCUSSION: The applicant proposes to build an all-suite hotel with adjoining restaurant and conference center on approximately seven acres of ground in the University of Utah Research Park. The proposed project will be ideally suited to the needs of the University, Research Park and especially to the patients and their families of the University’s Medical Center. The proposed development is competing with others to be awarded a ground lease and the right to develop in Research Park by the University Council.
Council Chairman Mabey referred the inducement resolution for industrial revenue bonds for Prowswood, Inc. to the Budget/Finance and Administration Committee; referred without objection.
(Q 83-1)
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
#1. RE: Consider and approve the reappointment of Sam Harman and Lynn M. Thatcher to two-year terms on the Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District Board.
DISCUSSION: Submitted is a letter from Wilbur C. Parkinson, President of the Board of Trustees of the Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District, recommending the reappointment of Sam Harman and Lynn M. Thatcher for another two year term on the Board. The present terms expire December 31, 1982 and the reappointment would be to December 31, 1984. This item was pulled from the agenda and referred to the next consent agenda because the financial disclosure statements had not been received.
(I 83-1)
#2. RE: Consider and approve the appointment of Louis E. Miller as Director of Airports.
DISCUSSION: In an executive session of the Airport Authority Board Meeting, with all members present except Joe Rosenblatt, it was decided to refer to the Mayor the two top candidates resulting from the search for a Director of Airports. They are: Louis H. Miller of Salt Lake City and Robert J. Mandeville of Reno, Nevada. While both candidates appeared to be highly qualified, it is the Board’s unanimous recommendation that Louis E. Miller be appointed Director of Airports.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember DePaulis seconded to approve the appointment of Louis E. Miller as Director of Airports, which motion carried, all members voting aye. Councilmember DePaulis congratulated Mr. Miller on this appointment.
(I 83-2)
#3. RE: Housing Advisory and Appeals Board.
DISCUSSION: There are presently four vacancies on the Housing Advisory and Appeals Board. It is recommended that Robert Gallegos be reappointed to another term, and that Maurine Swift, Taka Kida, and Jody Williams be appointed to fill the remaining vacancies.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember DePaulis seconded to approve the reappointment of Robert Gallegos and the appointment of Maurine Swift, Taka Kida, and Jody Williams to the Rousing Advisory and Appeals Board, which motion carried, all members voting aye.
(I 83-3)
#4. RE: Salt Lake Arts Council.
DISCUSSION: Several positions on the Salt Lake Arts Council have recently expired. It is recommended that two new members be appointed and that five existing members be reappointed. The five council members to be reappointed are Audrey Oestreicher, Ken Burton, Craig Carter, Lake Churchill, and Brent Herridge. They have been active and helpful members and have expressed the desire to continue their involvement on the council. The two new members to be appointed are Stephen Swaner with the Utah Symphony and Charles Brown, an attorney with Suiter, Axland, Armstrong and Hanson; these individuals will replace Shin Swenson and Mel Larew.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember DePaulis seconded to approve the reappointment of Audrey Oestreicher, Ken Burton, Craig Carter, Lake Churchill, Brent Herridge and the appointment of Stephen Swaner and Charles Brown to the Salt Lake Arts Council, which motion carried, all members voting aye.
(I 83-4)
#5. RE: Public Utilities Advisory Board.
DISCUSSION: It is recommended that W. Marvin Tuddenham be appointed to fill the existing vacancy on the Public Utilities Advisory Board.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember PePaulis seconded to approve the appointment of W. Marvin Tuddenham to the Public Utilities Advisory Board, which motion carried, all members voting aye.
(I 83-5)
#6. RE: Library Board
DISCUSSION: It is recommended that Sara S. Boyer be appointed to fill the existing vacancy on the Library Board.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember DePaulis seconded to approve the appointment of Sara S. Boyer to the Library Board, which motion carried, all members voting aye.
(I 83-6)
#7. RE: Consider and approve a request from the Emergency Housing Assistance Program for an appropriation of $10,000 to partially fund the Shelter Facility.
DISCUSSION: The EHAP/Shelter project has become a reality with the assistance of many local organizations within the community. This is just a temporary shelter to provide emergency housing for the unhoused families and individuals in the community. There is still a need for financial support to aid in the everyday cost of running the shelter. This is the reason for asking the City for $10,000 in assistance. Councilmember Davis asked if the private contributions totaling $21,000 included the Eccles Foundation contribution of $18,000. Heber Tibbets, head of the coalition running the shelter, stated that half of the $18,000 was included in the $21,000 but the other half of the contribution was being held for future needs.
A letter from the Foundation indicated that their interest was not for just the short-term, six-month program. Councilmember Davis also asked Mr. Tibbets if additional contributions had been received since last week; he stated that no large donations had been received. Councilmember Davis stated that she felt funding for this project should be from private sources because Salt Lake City is not in the social service business; social service is the function of the county and the state. Ms. Davis further stated that if the City contributes $10,000 the residents are paying for the project three times because taxes are paid to both the county and the state; the City already funds the rescue mission. She was concerned about the role of the City Council in funding these types of projects. Mayor Wilson stated that he has had concerns as well because the City does not really have statutory authority nor a broad enough tax base to handle social service functions. But he felt this was a unique circumstance and since there is no current form of funding from any of the agencies, except on a good will basis, everyone ought to contribute. The Mayor also stated that he would not want this to become a yearly donation and it has to be understood that this is not a yearly contribution. However, the Mayor felt that the donation was appropriate and justified on the basis that it is the humane and rightful thing to do because of the present economic situation. Also homeless people have an impact on the neighborhoods.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember DePaulis seconded to approve the request from the Emergency Housing Assistance Program for an appropriation of $10,000 to partially fund the Shelter Facility from CDBG slippage, which motion carried, all members voting aye except Councilmember Davis who voted nay.
(T 83-1)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Group Homes and Petition 314 of 1982 submitted by Jean Talbot.
RE: Amending zoning ordinances to allow group homes as conditional uses in all residential districts.
A public hearing, continued from October 12, 1982, was held at 6:15 p.m. before the Salt Lake City Council to discuss this issue.
RE: Petition 314 of 1982 submitted by Jean Talbot. The petitioner is requesting that the zoning on the south side of Merrimac Avenue between West Temple and the rear of the properties facing Main Street to a depth of 150’ be rezoned from its present Residential “R-4” classification to a Residential “R-6” classification to allow for her adult care center. The Planning Commission recommended that no change be made in the zoning but that Section 51-6-12 of the Revised Ordinances of Salt Lake City be amended to include adult care group homes for the elderly as a conditional use in “R-3A”, “R-4”, “R-5”, and “R-5A” zones with the number of residents per home limited to twelve.
A public hearing was held at 6:30 p.m. before the Salt Lake City Council to discuss Petition 314 of 1982. These two hearings were considered together because the issues are interrelated. Mark Hafey, Planning and Zoning Department, addressed the Council and stated that the draft ordinance would allow group homes in any district, under the Board of Adjustment’s review, as a conditional use. Mr. Hafey stated that he recalled some concern being expressed about a section in the ordinance allowing the Board the right to deny the use if in their judgment it was not compatible in the neighborhood.
Except for that portion, the ordinance is in keeping with the state legislation. Jean Talbot, petitioner, addressed the Council and stated that in Petition 314 she has asked for the zoning in her area to be changed to “R-6”. The Planning Commission recommended instead that Section 51-6-12 of the ordinances be amended to include adult care group homes for the elderly as conditional use but the Commission limited the number of residents per facility to 12. Ms. Talbot stated that she needed 18 to 20 residents in order to receive enough income to continue operating the home and providing the quality care that the residents now receive. Ms. Talbot stated that her home can accommodate 20 people. She wanted the Council and the Planning Commission to either give her permission to have more than 12 people in her home or change the zone to “R-6” so she could have 18 to 20 people. Ms. Talbot stated that her neighbors are in favor of this home but she needs enough people to keep the home operating.
Vernon Jorgensen, Planning and Zoning Department, addressed the Council and stated that the issue regarding group homes refers to homes for disadvantaged (handicapped) people, not correctional or elderly facilities. In regards to Petition 314, the Planning Commission recommended that group homes for the elderly be included in all districts. These would be two separate ordinance amendments and can be considered on their own merits. Mr. Jorgensen further stated that the group homes for disadvantaged would be limited to eight people, besides the supervisory people, which is in keeping with the state legislation. The elderly facilities would be limited to 12 people.
Larry Livingston from the City Council Office stated that the two issues, group homes and Petition 314, were submitted as individual items but the two are related. The Planning Commission made a recommendation on the Talbot petition and a recommendation on the group home issue but did not consider the two together. Mr. Livingston further stated that both touch on five or six issues that need to be resolved. He then outlined those issues: differentiating between types of group homes, the number of people allowed in the homes, in what zones the homes will be allowed, will they he handled as a conditional use, and the proximity of homes to each other.
Mr. Livingston concluded by stating that there are a myriad of issues and they need to be considered as a whole and not individually. He recommended that the Council hear comments regarding the two issues and then close the public hearings. The items should then be referred to the City Attorney’s Office so the issues can be harmonized. Ray Broadbent asked what the effect would be on commercial activity for the block facing Main Street if the zoning change is made as requested in Petition 314. He was concerned that the area would be down zoned because of residential increases. Councilmember DePaulis stated that he thought down zoning of the commercial property would be unlikely.
Bernice Cook, People’s Freeway, addressed the Council and stated that she thought Ms. Talbot could have the rest home without having the entire area over to West Temple zoned “R-6”; just have her portion rezoned. Mr. Hafey reiterated that the Planning Commission denied Ms. Talbot’s request for the zoning change but recommended that the group home ordinance be modified to include group homes for the elderly. Councilmember Mabey asked how Ms. Talbot would be impacted in the interim. Roger Cutler, City Attorney, stated that a license could not be issued unless the area is properly zoned.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember Whitehead seconded to close the public hearing regarding group homes, which motion carried, all members voting aye.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember Davis seconded that the Council request that an ordinance be prepared concerning group homes of all kinds, following the general guidelines of the Planning Commission as talked about, and giving the Council some options; and that Mr. Livingston from the Council staff be instructed to work with Judy Lever from the Attorney’s Office on the preparation of this ordinance, which motion carried, all members voting aye.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember Davis seconded to close the public hearing regarding Petition 314 of 1982, which motion carried, all members voting aye.
Councilmember Shearer moved and Councilmember DePaulis seconded to uphold the Planning Commission decision to deny the zoning change as requested in Petition 314 and make the recommendation that the planning staff advise Ms. Talbot how to proceed with her alternatives, which motion carried, all members voting aye.
(O 82-44 & P 82-355)
Northwest Quadrant Annexation
#1. RE: Petition 94 of 1982 submitted by Steven Swindle, Esq. for numerous owners including Gossner/Sheffield requesting the annexation of 1,490 acres located approximately between 6200 West to 8400 West and North Temple to 700 South.
A public hearing was held at 6:45 p.m. before the Salt Lake City Council to discuss Petition 94 of 1982. Randy Taylor, Planning and Zoning Department, outlined on a map the property to be annexed under the Northwest Quadrant Annexation. Craig Peterson, Director of Development Services, stated that because of advertising considerations it was necessary, at the last public hearing, to continue the hearings on the Northwest Quadrant Annexation. However, the City Council could close the hearings at this meeting.
Because the Council adopted the resolution adopting the Annexation Policy Declaration Amendment No 1.1, other jurisdictions that may have concerns regarding this annexation have five days in which to respond. If there are no responses then this annexation does not have to go before the boundary commission and the ordinance annexing a bulk of the property could be adopted next week. Another ordinance, to be adopted at a later meeting, would annex the final portion of the property. Steven Sheffield, petitioner, asked the Council to proceed based on statements that were made in the last public hearing. Steven Swindle, petitioner, reaffirmed support of the petition. Councilmember Shearer asked what the necessary annexation documents were and stated that she had a concern about the avigation easements. Judy Lever, Assistant City Attorney, stated that usually when final documentation is presented to the Council there is an ordinance and an agreement and if annexation is in the northwest area where the airport is concerned, there is also an avigation easement. When the Attorney’s Office was asked to prepare drafts of the documents for the Council, it was Development Services’ position that these documents could be handled through the development process when development actually occurs; therefor, the documents were not prepared and submitted to the Council.
Ms. Lever stated that she understood that Development Services was concerned that annexation proceed without working out the details in advance and assuming whatever risk there may be, if any, in terms of development. Councilmember Shearer asked about the risk involved. Ms. Lever stated that the risk would depend upon what the ordinances would be at the time of development. Risk might involve things that would not be covered by the subdivision laws like the dedication of the avigation easement; there might also be concerns about requiring dedication of roads that were not involved with the development. But development would be subject to the airport zoning map and the regulations associated with that.
Craig Peterson stated that there were several reasons why agreements were not prepared at this time. It is believed that this is a long-range development and none of the development is imminent. Mr. Peterson read from a letter stating the position of the Airport Authority Board regarding the avigation easement, “...it is our understanding that the zoning assigned upon annexation will be compatible with the recommendations of the land use policy plan and that further implementation of the plan’s recommendations will be put in place during the subdivision process (namely the avigation easement)...”. The ordinance as presently proposed by the Airport Authority Board would only require an avigation easement when an individual subdivides; there would be no requirement for such an easement if a subdivision does not take place.
Ms. Lever informed the Council that if there is development that is not preceeded by formal subdivision then only the requirements of the building permit would have to be met; development can occur outside of the traditional subdivision scenario that would not be subject to the broader subdivision powers. The easement that would generally come in, if it had been required now, would be a blanket easement that would involve all the land that the airport usually would identify that they were concerned about; they would get the land now as opposed to when it is developed. If the ordinances are not in effect when development occurs or if the avigation easements are different then the risk of not getting the land will be assumed.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Whitehead seconded to close the public hearing, which motion carried, all members voting aye.
(P 82-312)
#2. RE: Petition 180 of 1982 submitted by the Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints requesting the annexation of 43 acres located approximately between 6000 West to 6200 West from 700 South to the north line of the Western Pacific right of way.
A public hearing was held a 7:00 p.m. before the Salt Lake City Council to discuss Petition 180 of 1982. Elliot Christensen, LDS Church Investment Department, stated that the Church is supportive of the annexations and enthusiastic about the potential growth that exists in the northwest quadrant.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Whitehead seconded to close the public hearing, which motion carried, all members voting aye.
(P 82-313)
#3. RE: Petition 288 of 1982 submitted by C. Frank Gillmor and Tom Peck, et. al., requesting the annexation of approximately 3460 acres located in T1NR2W including an irregularly shaped parcel generally situated in the vicinity of 700 North to 3400 North from 4800 West to 7600 West (immediately west of the Salt Lake City International Airport and north of the Salt Lake International Center).
A public hearing was held at 7:15 p.m. before the Salt Lake City Council to discuss Petition 288 of 1982. Gerald Nielsen, representing Frank Gillmor, stated that the petitioner wants this annexation to occur.
Councilmember Fonnesheck moved and Councilmember Parker seconded to close the public hearing, which motion carried, all members voting aye except Council Members Whitehead and DePaulis who were absent when the vote was taken.
(P 82-316)
#4. RE: Petition 203 of 1982 submitted by the Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Northpoint #3) requesting annexation of approximately 2080 acres located in T1NR2W between approximately 6400 West and 8000 West and north of 700 North to 3200 North.
A public hearing was held at 7:30 p.m. before the Salt Lake City Council to discuss Petition 203 of 1982. Elliot Christensen, LDS Church Investment Department, reiterated his previous statement.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Shearer seconded to close the public hearing, which motion carried, all members voting aye except Council Members Whitehead and DePaulis who were absent when the vote was taken.
(P 82-314)
#5. RE: Petition 277 of 1982 (Bothwell/Swaner) submitted by Nielson and Senior, attorneys, requesting annexation of approximately 3006 acres including an irregularly shaped parcel generally situated in the vicinity of approximately 7400 West to 8800 West from South of I-80 to approximately 3200 North.
A public hearing was held at 7:45 p.m. before the Salt Lake City Council to discuss Petition 277 of 1982. Thomas L. Monson, representing Consolidated Realty, Inc. and Bothwell/ Swaner Company, stated that the petitioners reaffirm their continuing support for this annexation; they wanted the property zoned Agriculture “A-l” until a master zoning and development plan is conceived.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Shearer seconded to close the public hearing, which motion carried, all members voting aye except Councilmembers Whitehead and DePauJis who were absent when the vote was taken.
(P 82-315)
Petition 313 of 1982 submitted by Union Pacific Railroad Company.
RE: The request that 200 North Street between 400 West Street and 500 West Street be vacated to allow for full utilization for railroad operations. In exchange for the vacation of 200 West, petitioner proposes to retire and remove 14 of the present 22 tracks located over 300 North Street and will promptly improve the road surfaces and track crossings of the remaining eight tracks and will seek federal funding to install warning devices on the remaining eight tracks.
A public hearing was scheduled for 8:00 p.m. before the Salt Lake City Council. However, this item was pulled from the agenda pending proper publication. The hearing will be held February 8, 1983 at 6:45 p.m.
(P 82-358)
Petition 152 of 1982 submitted by Community Organization Operations Program.
RE: The request that property located at 131 North 900 West be rezoned from Residential “R-6” to Commercial “C-l” classification.
A public hearing was scheduled for 8:15 p.m. before the Salt Lake City Council. However, this item was pulled from the agenda pending proper publication. The hearing will be held February 8, 1983 at 7:00 p.m.
(P 82-357)
Meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m.