PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1985
THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, MET AS A COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1985, AT 5:15 P.M. IN ROOM 211 CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING.
THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL MEMBERS WERE PRESENT: RONALD J. WHITEHEAD EARL F. HARDWICK GRANT MABEY EDWARD W. PARKER SYDNEY R. FONNESBECK.
Councilmember Shearer resigned as the councilmember of District 5 on January 25, 1985, to assume a position with the Governor’s administration.
Councilmember Davis was absent from the meeting.
Council Chairperson Sydney Fonnesbeck presided at the meeting.
BRIEFING SESSION
#1. Mayor Wilson presented the Council with a proposal to change the appointment procedures for the Metropolitan Water Board. He indicated that as water rates become more of an issue in Salt Lake City more attention will be given to the board which taxes residents for water. He said his feelings were that it would be more expedient to have the Mayor recommend new members to the water board. A discussion followed concerning the Council’s desire to allow the Mayor more control over this particular board as opposed to the Council’s inability to take the time necessary to fully understand the workings of the board.
The Mayor is capable of recommending needed individuals as he is a member of the board. Council Members expressed concern about the Mayor having appointment powers for this board, when it is a board unlike others over which he retains appointment powers. This board is an independent body politic and can raise the mill levy. Dave Spatafore joined the discussion, indicating that as this issue is scheduled before the legislature on Friday, the Council should come to a decision concerning the language of the proposal before that time, because he will need to know how to proceed on Friday. Bill Barrett, Council attorney, said that he had read the proposal and indicated that it is legally correct. It was decided to table the issue until Thursday evening’s meeting.
#2. Dave Spatafore briefed the Council on the progress of certain issues now before the legislature which, if passed, will affect the City. These issues include flood prevention programs and the amount of money the state will expect from local governments for flood control.
The briefing session adjourned at 6:00 p.m.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, MET IN REGULAR SESSION ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1985, AT 6:00 P.M. IN ROOM 301 CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING.
THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL MEMBERS WERE PRESENT: RONALD J. WHITEHEAD EARL F. HARDWICK GRANT MABEY THOMAS M. GODFREY SYDNEY R. FONNESBECK EDWARD W. PARKER.
Councilmember Davis was absent from the meeting.
Mayor Ted L. Wilson, Albert Haines, chief administrative officer, Roger Cutler, city attorney, Kathryn Marshall, city recorder, and Lynda Domino, chief deputy recorder, were present.
Council Chairperson Sydney Fonnesbeck presided at the meeting and Councilmember Parker conducted the meeting.
Invocation was given by Police Chaplain R. J. Schrank.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Approval of Minutes.
Councilmember Hardwick moved and Councilmember Mabey seconded to approve the minutes of the Salt Lake City Council for the regular meeting held Tuesday, February 5, 1985, which motion carried, all members present voting aye.
(M 85-1)
Special Recognition
#1. Mayor Wilson presented a proclamation to Seth Miner who was Mayor-for-a-Day on Tuesday, February 19, 1985. The Mayor said that Seth met with public safety officials, toured the police and fire departments, attended a working lunch and attended policy meetings. Mayor Wilson commended Seth and said that he is an exceptional young man.
PETITIONS
Petition 400-144 of 1983 by Joanne Milner, et al.
RE: An amendment to the ordinance which was adopted on February 5, 1985, closing a 15’ alley at approximately 920 South from 800 to 900 West Streets. Without objection, this item was pulled from the agenda and referred to the consent agenda for March 5, 1985.
(P 84-19)
Petition 400-202 of 1984 by Northwest Community Council.
RE: Vacation of a 15’ alley which runs east from 1200 West at approximately 470 North.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Mabey seconded to schedule a public hearing for Tuesday, April 9, 1985, at 6:30 p.m. to discuss this petition, which motion carried, all members present voting aye except Council Members Whitehead and Hardwick who were absent when the vote was taken.
(P 85-15)
Petition 400-246 of 1984 by Granite Stake of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.
RE: Vacation of an alley located west of the Nibley Park Ward at 2450 South 600 East.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Mabey seconded to schedule a public hearing for Tuesday, March 12, 1985, at 8:30 p.m. to discuss this petition, which motion carried, all members present voting aye except Council Members Whitehead and Hardwick who were absent when the vote was taken.
(P 85-14)
Petition 400-263 of 1984 by Motel, Hotel Sales and Management.
RE: A request that the “C-1” zoning on the north side of North Temple and the west side of Redwood Road be extended north an additional 154 feet to allow for the construction of a 150 room “Embassy Suite” hotel/motel with its accompanying auxiliary uses and a free-standing restaurant.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Mabey seconded to schedule a public hearing for Tuesday, March 12, 1985, at 8:15 p.m. to discuss this petition, which motion carried, all members present voting aye except Council Members Whitehead and Hardwick who were absent when the vote was taken.
(P 85-16)
Petition 400-265 of 1984 by Gulfstream Properties/Gregg Revell.
RE: Rezoning of certain properties lying north of the commercial zone at 1836 West North Temple from a Residential “R-6” to a Commercial “C-1” classification to make possible the construction of a motel/hotel type development.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Mabey seconded to schedule a public hearing for Tuesday, March, 12, 1985, at 8:00 p.m. to discuss this petition, which motion carried, all members present voting aye except Council Members Whitehead and Hardwick who were absent when the vote was taken.
(P 85-17)
CITY COUNCIL
#1. RE: The appointment of an individual to fill the vacancy in the District #5 council position. On behalf of the Council, Council Chairperson Fonnesbeck said that they were pleased with the number and quality of people who responded to the request for an individual to fill this vacancy.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Whitehead seconded to appoint Thomas Godfrey to fill the unexpired term of councilmember for District #5, which motion carried, all members present voting aye. Mr. Godfrey commended the Council for the way the interview process was conducted and he thanked them for appointing him to fill this vacancy. Mayor Wilson also commended the Council for the way the interview process was conducted. He extended the cooperation of the administration to Mr. Godfrey and said that he respects the integrity of the office of councilmember. Mayor Wilson wished Mr. Godfrey good luck.
(I 85-5)
MAYOR’S OFFICE
#1. RE: The appointment of LaVone Liddle Gamonal as the Planning Commission representative to the Historical Landmark Committee.
Councilmember Whitehead moved and Councilmember Hardwick seconded to suspend the rules and on first reading approve the appointment of LaVone Liddle Gamonal, which motion carried, all members present voting aye except Councilmember Fonnesbeck who was absent when the vote was taken.
(I 85-4)
#2. RE: A resolution outlining the relationship of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County to the City and County Building and expressing continued conceptual and financial support for the restoration and preservation of the Salt Lake City and County Building. Albert Haines, chief administrative officer, explained that this resolution essentially prescribes a broad policy framework for the rehabilitation of the City and County Building. He said that ownership of the building would shift to the City, and the county would become a tenant occupying up to 20% of the space, which will be identified by the City. He also mentioned that the intent is for the county to have an indefinite tenant right at the City’s discretion.
Mr. Haines explained that if the resolution is adopted it would be forwarded to the County Commission so they could pursue their course of action. Mr. Haines said that adoption of this resolution would allow the administration to proceed with finalizing project costs and developing a timetable for construction.
Councilmember Parker moved and Councilmember Whitehead seconded to suspend the rules and on first reading adopt Resolution 17 of 1985 outlining the relationship of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County to the City and County Building and expressing continued conceptual and financial support for the restoration and preservation of the Salt Lake City and County Building, which motion carried, all members present voting aye except Councilmember Fonnesbeck who was absent when the vote was taken.
(R 85-2)
#3. RE: An interlocal agreement with the Utah Department of Community and Economic Development for a grant to the Shelter in Salt Lake City. The funds will be sent to the Mayor’s Office to be disbursed upon the Mayor’s signature on the contract.
Councilmember Mabey moved and Councilmember Godfrey seconded to adopt Resolution 16 of 1985 authorizing the execution of an interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Utah Department of Community and Economic Development which provides for a $36,000 grant from the Utah Department of Community and Economic Development to the Shelter in Salt Lake City, which motion carried, all members present voting aye.
(C 85-37)
POLICE DEPARTMENT
#1. RE: An ordinance amendment relating to child passenger safety.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Mabey seconded to adopt Ordinance 7 of 1985, amending the Traffic Code of the Revised Ordinances of Salt Lake City, Utah, 1965, by adding Article 24 relating to child passenger safety, which motion carried, all members present voting aye except Council Members Whitehead and Hardwick who were absent when the vote was taken.
(O 85-5)
PUBLIC WORKS
#1. RE: An interlocal agreement with the Utah Department of Transportation for partial reimbursement for the purchase of safety equipment.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Mabey seconded to adopt Resolution 18 of 1985 authorizing the execution of an interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Utah Department of Transportation to allow Salt Lake City to receive partial reimbursement from Federal Highway Administration 402 Safety Funds for the purchase of safety equipment, which motion carried, all members present voting aye except Council Members Whitehead and Hardwick who were absent when the vote was taken.
(C 85-35)
#2. RE: An interlocal agreement with Utah Department of Transportation wherein after the construction is completed on I-80, Salt Lake City will assume jurisdiction for portions of North Temple Street between Saltair and Redwood Road.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Mabey seconded to adopt Resolution 19 of 1985 authorizing the execution of an interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Department of Transportation providing that after completion of construction of I-80 between Saltair and Redwood Road, Salt Lake City will assume jurisdiction of portions of North Temple Street; these portions of North Temple Street will become city streets and will be utilized mainly as frontage roads to the freeway and as access streets in the westside area, which motion carried, all members present voting aye except Council Members Whitehead and Hardwick who were absent when the vote was taken.
(C 85-36)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Petition 400-173 of 1984 by Cynthia R. Adams, et al.
RE: Vacating an alley located between 900 East and 1000 East and Forest View Avenue and 2700 South in Salt Lake City. A nonadvertised public hearing was held at 6:30 p.m. to discuss this petition.
Mark Hafey, planning and zoning, outlined the area on a map and said that this is a T-shaped alley east of 900 East running north and south between 2700 South and Forest View Avenue. He explained that the alley is actually a private right-of-way but the Attorney’s Office suggested that this be dealt with as a public alley since the City could have an interest in the alley through prescriptive rights. Mr. Hafey explained that one resident signed the petition but he is not the owner of record and one property owner did not sign the petition but no opposition has been expressed. He explained that the north/south direction of the alley is useable and access to some garages is through the alley; the east/west portion of the alley is only platted and essentially does not exist. He said that the Planning Commission recommends vacating the alley. He mentioned that the disposition of the alley would have to be determined among the residents.
Cynthia Adams, petitioner, said that this alley is a nuisance. She explained that trees and shrubberies have been ruined by inappropriate vehicles being driven through the alley and she explained that on one occasion the alley was used to dismantle stolen cars. She said that children loiter in the alley as they walk to and from school. Ms. Adams explained that they wanted to erect a fence allowing access to the garages but closing off the alley as a thoroughfare.
Ms. Adams referred to the resident who signed the petition instead of the owner of record and explained that the residents are buying the house and they feel the house should be in their name. She said when they signed the petition they told her the house was in their name. She also explained that the owner of record signed the petition but it was lost. There was a question about whether this hearing should have been advertised since the petition was not signed by all property owners. Because this is not a public alley but a right-of-way, Leigh von der Esch, council executive director, suggested that this be approved subject to attorney review of this question. No one from the audience opposed this petition. Without objection the public hearing was closed.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Mabey seconded to adopt Ordinance 8 of 1985, in concept, vacating an alley located between 900 East and 1000 East and Forest View Avenue and 2700 South, subject to attorney review of the question regarding publication of the public hearing notice, which motion carried, all members present voting aye except Councilmember Whitehead who was absent when the vote was taken.
(P 85-8)
Foothill Development Overlay Zone
RE: An ordinance amending Chapter 2 of Title 51 of the Revised Ordinances of Salt Lake City, Utah, 1965, as amended, by adding Sections 51-2-13.1 and 51-2-15.6 relating to definitions; and an ordinance amending Chapter 12A of Title 51 of the Revised Ordinances by amending Sections 5l-l2A-l and 5l-12A-2 and adding Sections 51- l2A-3 and 5l-12A-4, relating to the foothill development overlay zone.
A public hearing was held at 6:45 p.m. to discuss the ordinances. Larry Livingston, council legislative analyst, said that this ordinance would add language to the current foothill development overlay zone regarding height of buildings and in some cases would make the heights more restrictive. He explained that currently “R-l” zoning allows 35 feet of height which is measured to the average height of the roof if it is a peaked roof. He said that the amendment changes the method of measurement so any structure is measured from the average grade of the approved lot to the top of the roof and it also changes the allowable height from 35 feet to 30 feet for a pitched roof and 25 feet for a flat roof. He explained that these heights would not require a review. Mr. Livingston said that if a structure exceeds these heights then there would be a process for the applicant to follow to get the height approved.
Mr. Livingston briefly outlined the process which would be followed to obtain approval for a structure not meeting the allowable height restrictions. He said that an application would be submitted to the Board of Adjustment showing three things: First, there must be difficulty with the topography to make it hard to meet the lower height requirement; second, the building plan must be designed specifically to meet the topography of the lot; and third, the applicant must disclose what impact there will be on the neighbors’ views because of the additional height. He said that the Board can deny an application if they find that the plans are not specific to that applicant’s lot, if they find that the neighbors’ views are being impaired and there is a way to correct the situation, or if the structure is not within the character of the neighborhood. Mr. Livingston referred to a map and pointed out the areas where the “F-1” overlay zone currently exists. Mr. Livingston presented petitions signed by citizens who support the proposed amendments to the foothill development overlay zone. These citizens also requested that additional foothill properties be subject to the revised “F-l” zone. These petitions are on file in the Office of the City Recorder. Councilmember Fonnesbeck asked about the propriety of protecting the view of a small group of people living on the foothills.
Mr. Livingston explained that all zoning ordinances in some sense affect view since they have height restrictions and set back restrictions for the purpose of making properties livable next to each other. For clarification Councilmember Fonnesbeck said that an individual would not be denied the right to build, they are being asked to consider their neighbors. Mr. Livingston said this is correct and said that in effect the ordinance does not change anything except it adds a process to be followed if the desired height for a structure exceeds what is allowed.
Councilmember Mabey asked about measuring a structure. Mr. Livingston explained that all faces would be measured and the highest face must meet the requirement. He added that the point from where the measurement is taken is called the “established grade” which is defined as being the grade that has been given lot approval under the subdivision process. Ellen Callister, 1454 Tomahawk, referred to an 8-acre parcel of land behind the homes in her area which is owned by the Salt Lake City Board of Education and she said that there are currently no restrictions on this parcel. She said that the neighborhood is anxious for this property to be included in the zone. She expressed support for this ordinance.
Dick Moffatt, 1515 Preston Street, project manager for Ensign Downs Subdivision, said he was in favor of the concept but opposed this particular ordinance. It was Mr. Moffatt’s opinion that this amendment would severely limit the allowable height and he expressed concern about how structures would be measured. It was also Mr. Moffatt’s opinion that the ordinance was vague regarding the Board of Adjustment approval. He mentioned that a request could be denied if a proposal is not in keeping with the character of the neighborhood and he questioned how the character of a neighborhood would be defined. Mr. Moffatt asked if this amendment would apply to subdivisions which have been platted, engineered, and improved, or if it would apply only to new subdivisions. Mr. Moffatt mentioned that he has sold 100 hillside lots and has not had a conflict with views. He supported the existing ordinance.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Mabey seconded to close the public hearing, which motion carried, all members present voting aye except Council Members Hardwick and Whitehead who were absent when the vote was taken. Councilmember Fonnesbeck mentioned that she had questions which she wanted to discuss in a meeting of the Committee of the Whole.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Godfrey seconded to refer the ordinances to the Committee of the Whole, February 26, 1985, at 5:00 p.m., which motion carried, all members present voting aye except Councilmembers Whitehead and Hardwick who were absent when the vote was taken.
(O 84-32)
Petition 400-237 of 1984
by The Boyer Company
RE: The vacation of remnant pieces of streets and alleys contained within the petitioner’s property at 1900 West North Temple and also Winifred Street, which is a half Street running north from North Temple, and Gertie Avenue running east from Winifred Street.
A public hearing was held at 7:15 p.m. to consider this petition. Mark Hafey, planning and zoning, outlined the area on a map and said that when this issue was before the Planning Commission two property owners had not signed the petition but since that time they have signed so the petition contains the signatures of all abutting property owners. He said that the Planning Commission recommended closure of the alleys and streets and that the property be sold to the petitioner. Mr. Hafey said the Planning Commission also recommended that the petitioner bear the appraisal costs, that permanent access be maintained through easements for water, sewer, and utilities, and that easements be maintained for any utilities which may be located in and over the alleys and streets.
Kern Gardner, petitioner, said that they are desirous of selling approximately 18 acres of their property which would be developed into an apartment complex. He indicated it had come to their attention that apparently some of the streets and alleys within the property had not been previously vacated from an obsolete plat. Mr. Gardner said that they were planning to develop an office park on the remaining property and wanted the streets vacated in order to install the rights of way which would be needed for the completion of the park.
The question of property value was raised and Mr. Haines said that they met with the petitioners regarding the value of the property to be vacated. He said that this particular area is clouded since the City requires a sewer easement, which apparently was never recorded, and there are questions regarding the value of the street dedication which will be part of the project. He said at this point they would probably assume that the benefits to the City in terms of new street dedications, easements, and other considerations would be appropriately offset. Mr. Gardner requested that the vacation be approved and the administration resolve this situation. He added that they would be installing more dedicated rights of way than are being vacated and he agreed that there is an offset.
Councilmember Mabey said that if the City vacates the property, the City would either sell or agree to a trade. Mr. Haines indicated this was correct and said the City would not pay the petitioner any money. Councilmember Mabey asked why the streets would be vacated instead of closed and Councilmember Whitehead indicated that if the streets are closed they have to be sold. No one from the audience opposed this request.
Councilmember Mabey moved and Councilmember Whitehead seconded to close the public hearing, which motion carried, all members present voting aye except Councilmember Fonnesbeck who was absent when the vote was taken.
Councilmember Whitehead moved and Councilmember Mabey seconded to vacate the property and request the administration to evaluate the value of the properties which are being exchanged; if there is a difference in value, the petitioner will pay the city but the city will not be obligated to pay any money to the petitioner, which motion carried, all members present voting aye except Councilmember Fonnesbeck who was absent when the vote was taken.
(P 85-1)
Fiscal Year 1984-85 Budget
RE: Amending the Fiscal Year 1984-85 budget for Salt Lake City.
A public hearing was held at 7:30 p.m. to consider the amendments. Albert Haines, chief administrative officer, outlined the budget amendment summary (a copy of this document is on file in the Office of the City Recorder). He noted a $232,500 figure under the General Fund of Finance and Administrative Services which he explained is additional cost, offset by additional earnings in interest income. He referred to $544,155 of carry-over funds in the Fleet Fund and said that fleet management operates on a cash basis budget rather than accrual so they are requesting a reappropriation to match encumbrances. He referred to the request for a $150,000 contingency transfer which would be used to reimburse fleet for flood recovery programs of public works and parks relating to the activities of last fall.
Mr. Haines referred to the police department and mentioned that the items listed are revenue offsetting expenses for state grants, increase in witness fees, and the snow storm in October. He referred to public works and said that most of these items relate to the snow storm emergency and the leaf-bag program instituted shortly thereafter. Mr. Haines referred to $1,260,000 which is a transfer in from General Fund for part of Kennedy Drive and said that this establishes the authority for the City to proceed with the development of the project. He said that the revenue offset will be the sale of lots.
Councilmember Mabey referred to $150,000 which had been transferred from the 1700 South project to the Sugar House Beautification project and asked if the 1700 South project would receive funds in the next fiscal year. Palmer DePaulis, public works director, explained that the 1700 South project will be in two phases: The first phase will be State Street to 300 West and the second phase will be 300 West to 700 West. He said the next allocation of Class C road funds will be used for 1700 South. Mr. DePaulis said that the project is too big to do at once, mainly because of problems with the rights of way.
Mr. Haines asked Steve Fawcett, finance office, to explain a $1,000,000 reduction in the CIP budget. Mr. Fawcett said that there were two projects, West Valley Highway and Railroad Safety Improvements, which received federal highway monies. Salt Lake City was to be the lead agency and receive the funds to complete the projects. He said that the projects are still in existence but the state has now decided to be the lead agency so the funds have to be removed from the budget.
Mr. Haines referred to a request under Development Services for an additional building inspector and part-time plumbing inspector and mentioned that there has been an increased demand for inspection services. He referred to an increase in the fire department budget to cover additional constant manning costs. Mr. Haines noted the items relating to the October snow storm emergency and said that this emergency cost $600,520, which were costs over and above the general operating expenses. He said that the costs have been allocated to the various departments and funds, and he said they are proposing that the funds be removed from the fund balance in the Emergency Fund.
No one from the audience opposed the budget amendments. Without objection the public hearing was closed. Leigh von der Esch, council executive director, suggested that the Council could approve the Airport Fund at this meeting, since they have critical projects which cannot proceed without the amendments, and refer the remainder of the amendments to the Committee of the Whole for February 26, 1985. She said that this would give Mr. Godfrey (the newly appointed councilmember) an opportunity to review the budget amendments prior to adoption.
Mr. Haines suggested that the public utilities amendments also be approved. Ms. von der Esch indicated that the Airport Fund, Public Utilities Fund, and Capital Improvement Fund could be approved, and the General Fund and a question regarding revenue could then be discussed on the 26th.
Councilmember Mabey moved and Councilmember Hardwick seconded to approve the budget amendments for the Capital Improvement Fund, Public Utilities Fund, and the Airport Fund, as requested, and refer the remaining budget amendments to the Committee of the Whole for discussion on February 26, 1985, which motion carried, all members present voting aye except Councilmember Fonnesbeck who was absent when the vote was taken.
(B 84-5)
Housing and Community Development Needs
RE: Citizen input regarding Salt Lake City’s housing and community development needs, relating to consideration of the allocation of 11th Year Community Development Block Grant funds.
A public hearing was held at 8:00 p.m. to receive citizen input. Ms. Stephanie Loker, capital planning and programming, said that the purpose of the meeting was to receive citizen input about the community development program in general and also housing and community development needs which the city has that can be addressed with the Community Development Block Grant funds. She also requested citizen input regarding good and bad areas of the program.
Captain William Pickup, Salvation Army, said that they are providing services without a building and he reaffirmed their need for funds in order to re-establish the program. Bernice Cook, People’s Freeway Community Council, spoke on behalf of Dee Anderson and said that funds are needed to improve the Lucy Avenue area. She said that this area has flooding problems. Mary Allen, Housing Outreach Rental Program, said there is a great demand for housing and she suggested that when housing is torn down it should be replaced with housing. She asked the Council to consider housing needs and the need for housing that people can afford.
Margaret Ellis said that there is a need to fund transitional housing for battered women. She explained that currently women are only allowed to stay at available shelters for 30 days and this is not enough time. She mentioned that transitional housing would provide housing for about six months and would also provide vocational help and psychological help. Virginia Walton, Community Action Program, requested continued support for housing. She also asked for continued support for the food banks. Pauline Valdez, Community Action Program, also requested continued support for the food banks.
Gene Saunder supported an increase in low-cost housing. Joel VanOrden, 755 South Green Street, said that Green Street needs to be widened. It was his opinion that this would help attract families to the neighborhood. Linda Eidiken, Children’s Museum, requested funding to renovate a portion of their building in conjunction with Lalapalooza, which is a non-profit art organization. She explained that this space would be occupied by Lalapalooza and would also provide work-shop and class-room space for art projects that will expand the programming of the Children’s Museum. Mark Pinnock, student government at the University of Utah, supported this request and said that there needs to be a greater emphasis on educational programs. He said that the Children’s Museum offers early education to children.
John Hiskey, Mayor’s Office, addressed the issue of economical development and said there is a need for a revolving loan fund. He said this type of program provides pay back, jobs for young people, and assists small businesses. Gayanne Whorton, Westminster neighborhood, requested funds to develop the site which was acquired for a park in their area. She also asked that their area be included in a target area. Sadao Nagata, Japanese/American Citizen League, requested funding to acquire a building and establish a headquarters for their group. He said that this league has been in existence for 50 years in Salt Lake City and has not had a place from which to operate as a community oriented service organization.
Bernice Cook, People’s Freeway Community Council, indicated that there is a need for low-income housing and suggested that instead of tearing down good housing, future development take place on vacant land. Jesse Lopez requested continued support for the Mexican Civic Center and for those programs trying to serve the less fortunate in the community.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck moved and Councilmember Mabey seconded to close the public hearing, which motion carried, all members present voting aye.
(T 85-2)
CITIZEN COMMENTS
#1. Ms. Sue Hackett, executive director of Low-Income Family Economics, said there is a need for transitional housing in Salt Lake City for battered women. She explained that the YWCA has a program for battered women but the stay is limited to 30 days. She suggested that a transitional facility could provide physical and educational needs as well as help women enhance their knowledge of themselves, their experiences and their world.
Mayor Wilson agreed that there is a need for this type of facility. He said that Salt Lake City does riot have the legal base for social services; social programs are funded through the county and the state. The Mayor said that Salt Lake could help as an advocate for this program and he indicated that his office could meet with Ms. Hackett.
The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.